Wiki.js Reviews

Modern Wiki app, highly Versatile, elegant UI

Sometimes Wiki performance was deteriorated due to bugs, better to have few add on features for ease of use.

Optimized our database, with Wiki we have reduced our database cost, Maintenance cost.

Web based feature makes it portalble. Ability to perform a global search. Built-in access controls and authentication connectors. Ability to draw meaningful reports, Ability to feed meta-data for each document.

The need for a database. Competitive alternate tools like Confluence and GitBook.

Try implementing it for knowledge sharing across various teams It is free software released under the Affero GNU General Public License.

We use it to share knowledge documents within our team, We like the fact that its open-source tool that offers fantastic documentation and support

Wiki.js is quick and very easy to install. Moreover, it consists of many modules like version history, authentication and themes. All things integrated into a single application.

Nothing as of now. everything seems fine.

Strong software with inbuilt functionality.

version history problem, themes configuration, storage and media assets and because of all these features we can produce effective results and increase our performance overall as a Team.

The best "feature" for me is the ability to self-host the software to maximize the security of my clients' confidential data. Composing pages using Markdown helps keep formatting consistent and less time-consuming. The software has a good variety of customization options and supports integrations with other software used internally. Another must-have is dark mode, which Wiki.js has done well. Being an open-source product, submitting bug fixes and requesting features is easy - so is adding features on your own.

There are a few UI quirks that take getting used to, although improvements and features are being added from time to time that minimizes these relatively minor issues.

Use the containerized version to make the initial setup painless. This also makes upgrades easy to roll back if something goes wrong.

Wiki.js serves as a central repository for internal processes, hardware/software documentation, and a reference for the configuration of solutions we provide for our clients. Since Wiki.js supports multiple authentication methods, we can also allow clients to access portions of the site as required.

Authentication is good in this tool, which is easy and good logins for local, and cloud

Stiil needs to more to find out dislikes

More help we are getting with this scripting easy to learn and to write scripts on verious tasks.

Excellent collaborative tool which can be installed anywhere and works with a superfast node js engine.

Navigation boxes although they can be dealt with

Reduced software downtime,speeds up deliverables,reducing project cost and is a good knowledge store house since it works with a wide range of databases

The best thing about this software is the fact that content is written using markdown syntax and all the content is directly synced with git. also a lot of authentication is present with this software and above all, it is open-source software.

nothing as such but the user experience can be improved because it has a lot a UI bugs which can be resolved to make the UI better.

If you really want to make very professional ,robust documentation about any topic,you should definetely try this sofware out .It is very easy to install (as it has one click install process) and use.

basically we use it for making documentation about any POC's and the benefits basically is that it makes the process of making documentation very easy and fun .

Fine grained access management and easy UI

More improvements required on the UI and defect fixes

Generating documentation and syncing with GIT without additional effort

Wiki.js is an open source app based on node.js and Git. The advantages of using wiki.js is that it is an open source tool which makes it's use very vast among the engineers. Also the other use of wiki.js is that it is faster than the most common node.js

There isn't any drawback of wiki.js as of now as it is an amazing application and it is faster and more reliable than other open source applications and it makes our work so easy and efficient.

In my organization we use wiki.js as it is an open source tool which works on java script and it is one of the fastest java script tool ao it makes our work more efficient, reliable and faster.

One thing that I like most about Wiki.js is that it is open source. Anyone can easily install and use it. It has easy to use and clean user interface which enhances the user experience. Since this tool is built on NodeJs, it provides high-speed performance. It has different authentication and administrative functions, which can be easily managed. This helps to maintain all documents whether it be public or private.

There are some User Interface bugs present on Wiki.js which somewhat ruin the overall experience of a user. Some of Wiki.js' competitors like Confluence, and XWiki provide better content collaboration and note-taking features.

With Wiki.js we tried to resolve documentation-related problems for our product's architectural and engineering requirements. Using Wiki.js, we were able to create clear documentation for all engineering guidelines and practices. This proved very helpful while onboarding any new engineer on the development.