Sanity Reviews

The flexibility in creating your own content structure is uniqe. Both the focus on developer experience with modern technology and the ease of use for content creators are at its best. Its where easy to create complex data structures. Handling of images and media is also where good.

Not to mutch to dislike. But there is always room for improvement.

Documentation and examples is good, but there could be even more, since there is so many possibilities in configuration and so on. More official plugins is also a thing to level up the product.

We use Sanity as a headless content platform for our customers. It solves structures and easy of use for our customers without beeing opinionated on how you shoud solve a modern website.

- Ease of use

- Ease of implementation

- Great Documentation

- Easy plugin setup

- Easy integration into your client app

The only bad thing i can comment on sanity is it's type support, it's more of a tacked on feature as opposed to how most apps have it as a first class feature.

Sanity helps me update my data for my website easily and allows me update it on the go.

Very flexible to create whatever you want, while having a lot of cool standards

The boilerplate, the number of queries and schema that you have to rewrite each time

We offer our clients a variety of services using Sanity, some want an ecommerce store and some just want a marketing site

When it comes to choosing a CMS, Sanity has become my go-to option without hesitation. I have used Sanity as a CMS for both professional e-commerce projects and personal projects. Its flexibility in structuring data to fit specific project requirements, seamless implementation, and integration capabilities have truly impressed me. Additionally, the standout real-time collaboration feature has been invaluable, enabling me to actively track live data changes and contributions.

I encountered some challenges initially when working with GROQ, Sanity's query language. Getting accustomed to its syntax and structure posed some difficulties at the start.

At work, when we needed a CMS for a big e-commerce site. We picked Sanity, and it turned out to be a great choice.

We got all our products into Sanity, setting up their structure exactly how we needed by defining their schema. Using GROQ to get data was really helpful. It made filtering and sorting data super easy and made our website faster.

Now, our clients find it simple to add their products on Sanity, which has been a big win for us.

Fine grained control of all aspects of our content. The ability to make custom functionality. Once you learn Groq, it's great. Also grafql support.

The documentation could provide more example of usage.

Try it. You will not regret. It's awesome. Really awesome.

Content on our different platforms and solutions. This goes from website, app and in context help texts I. Our web app. When we need content in our systems, we use Sanity. The true power of headless.

Sanity.io stands out as a platform that not only meets but exceeds expectations. The structured content model, combined with the ability to adapt the system to my needs, has truly elevated the way I approach and execute projects. Sanity.io has proven to be the innovative and flexible solution I was looking for, making my transition from Contentful a decision I confidently stand by.

One area where Sanity.io falls short is in its support system. Faster response times would greatly enhance the user experience, providing quicker solutions to issues and improving overall satisfaction with the platform.

Sanity solves content management challenges with its flexible schema and version control integration, offering a developer-friendly environment. The platform's use of the GROQ query language, while initially requiring learning, provides powerful data manipulation capabilities. With an intuitive interface and support for community plugins, Sanity streamlines content creation and enhances extensibility, making it a versatile and adaptive solution for modern development workflows.

The mosst impressive feature of Sanity is its easy integration with multiple languages. This capability is essential for global business looking to expand thier reach to diverse markets. Sanity's document structure allows for seamless transaltion and localization of content. making it incredibly efficient for our marketing team to manage website contents as building blocks in various languages.

For these new to headless CMS, the inital setup and understanding of Sanity's system can be challenging, It requires a certain level of technical expertise, which might be a hurdle for less tech-savvy users or developers. Also the sanity pricing can be a bit steep as your usage grows, but with their new pricing, it should be acceptable for most start-ups

Single Source of Truth for Contents. In our company, Sanity acts as a single sourcec of truth for all digital content. this centralization simplifies content mangement, reducing the comp;exities associated with handling content across multiple platforms and formats. with the integration with next.js framework, the marketing team able to update website content instantly without reaching the coding team.

I like to have my schema defined together with my code, this way, I'm sure that the schema is versioned correctly with the project this is very easy to use and implement, and it's also very easy to integrate with plugins that are created by the community, like the plugin table, color, youtube, etc.

The GROQ query language is very versatile but sometimes time is hard to get all the fields that I want or to fetch them correctly, maybe if GraphQL has all GROQ features it will help to have an alternative with complex queries.

Having an easy way for the site's administrator to update any content on the landing pages and see the changes in real time is awesome, and with the new Perspective feature we're also able to preview the pages inside the panel without publishing to the live site.

it's flexibility and ease of use, ease of integration

Nothing but they can improve in various aspects

I use sanity as backend(admin page for managing my content)

I used sanity at work as a CMS for one of the e-commerce projects and also for my personal projects. I loved how I could structure the data according to the project needs and also it was pretty easy to implement and integrate. Besides that, the real-time collaboration feature stood out, allowing me to monitor live changes to data and contributors. I will always go with sanity first if I need a CMS for my projects

GROQ, the query language used by Sanity, can be complex initially. Also, Sanity does not provide different environments, such as production and staging, which can lead to issues, potentially resulting in unintended alterations to production datasets.

At work, we required a CMS for a significant e-commerce website and were in the process of deciding between Contentful and Sanity. We went with Sanity and was a good decision we made.

We successfully added all our products into Sanity, tailoring their structure precisely to our requirements by defining their schema. Additionally, utilizing GROQ for data retrieval proved immensely beneficial, enabling efficient filtering and sorting of the data response.

It has made the website fast and easy for our clients to add their products on Sanity.