QuickReviewer Reviews

As a web development company, we often end up taking dozens of screenshots of websites we create for our clients. Although our proofing process is pretty streamlined, it is not perfect, and we often end up missing a comment or two. With Quick Reviewer, the experience has been amazing. Our clients love it, our designers love it, and our developers love it. We can now proof a live website without jumping through hoops to get all the change requests incorporated.

The only issue we face is when some clients are reluctant to let us put third party plugins or code onto their site for proofing, but we work around it by placing the site on our servers, proofing it and then pushing the live one to the client's server.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Get a demo today. Or better yet, sign up for the free account. I am sure you'll love it too.

Quick Reviewer solves problems associated with proofing of websites and videos. As you proof the asset in its natural state (websites are proofed as websites, videos as videos), you end up getting a more natural feel and you can concentrate more on the job at hand, rather than taking screenshots all day.

I've mostly worked on web design, documents and video ads/reels - just short-form videos. It doesn't hurt the pocket and works like a charm in getting reviews aligned, annotations work just how they should. It's great for just reviewing projects as well, that's how I first interacted with it, and the ease of using the platform worked to their advantage. It's been under a year and I've introduced so many people to Quick Reviewer with just their reviewing links. Gotta love the integrations they offer as well! Quite the well-rounded reviewing software that gets the job done, and how!

There are little bits here and there that could be so much more. Their updates really do look promising though.

It helps us review and edit content.

Enables better quality of video content with efficiency in terms of the feedback loop being shortened and quicker TAT for the team.

Branding revamps are a breeze with web design reviews and content redrafts done all in one.

QuickReviewer proves remarkably user-friendly and easily shareable with those tasked with reviewing our PDFs. It streamlines the comment and response process, eliminating the need for multiple emails. What's particularly valuable is the capability to annotate and rotate PDF proofs within QuickReviewer, a feature that holds significant importance for us. Furthermore, the comments seamlessly adjust alongside the proof's orientation.

There's nothing to dislike about it. it's quite good.

QuickReviewer has helped me in editing my videos, in this, I can make changes in the videos with my team in very simple ways.

we were grappling with version control with every tool we used until QuickReviewer came in. We are now proofing and finalizing more designs than ever before.

QuickReviewer does not work with our in-house project management tool. But I guess that is too much to ask from a mass-market yet world-class proofing tool.

even though there is an extra step involved in adding entries to our project management tool, QuickReviewer has made the review process so simple that now it takes minutes for tasks that took days. Everyone is more productive with QuickReviewer around!

It took us hours or days to complete one review per client. Now, it sometimes takes minutes. This is why we love using Quick Reviewer.

There's nothing much to dislike unless you're nitpicking.

Our clients can see their design progress through various stages in real-time. Reviewers and designers are all on one page, making it simple for everyone to be productive.

Quickreviewer helped in getting accurate feedback on design or video frame. With the help of Quickreviewer we streamlined the review cycle and get to market faster.

As of now it's going well, if it could integrate with YouTube, things would've been much better. But overall it's going well.

With the help ofQuickreviewer we streamlined the review cycle and get to market faster. I can compare both versions with the help of quickreviewer.

I am a creative lead, and I must approve everything that goes out to our clients. Before we got Quick Reviewer, this meant that every morning I would have a dozen (or two/three dozen) emails that I would go through, understand, put together the various docs, and screenshots in a folder, and give comments per email per the screenshot, then share them back to the team. In short - it was a terrible way to do things. With Quick Reviewer, reviewing various types of media assets is an enjoyable process. I am now done with my review in less than an hour and move on to more creative things.

There are no problems with using Quick Reviewer. It would be good to have some automated workflows that we can set

Creative heads need to spend time on the design and drill deep to see if it meets the requirements. This is an important and significant task that sometimes can take up the better part of the day to complete. With Quick Reviewer, we spend an hour at most on reviews. Earlier that used to be a 4 to 6-hour process.

QuickReviewer is easy to use and very helpful for all creatives. With the help of QuickReviewer, taking reviews has become much easier for our team now.

Nothing as of now but sometimes takes time to load the larger files.

It has saved our time and we are free from long mail threads now all because of QuickReviewer.