Home/ Software Testing Tools/ PractiTest/ Reviews
Cloud Based Test Management System with Several Integrations
63.4%
29.9%
4.9%
1.3%
0.4%
Extensive Integrations, User Friendly Interface, Comprehensive Reporting Features, Efficient Test Case Management
Lack of Bulk Editing Options, Limited UI Customizations, Occasional Performance Issues, Steep Learning Curve
Based on user reviews, PractiTest is generally well-received for its user-friendly interface, comprehensive features, and robust reporting capabilities. It is praised for its ability to streamline testing processes, improve collaboration, and enhance overall project visibility. However, some users have expressed concerns regarding its pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. Overall, PractiTest is considered a reliable and efficient tool for managing and executing testing activities, catering to the needs of various industries and team sizes.
AI-Generated from the text of User Reviews
PractiTest makes traceability easier by associating requirements with test cases. This guarantees that testing activities correspond with the project requirements as stated.
The platform encourages the reuse of test cases, which cuts down on duplication and saves time.
I appreciate that PractiTest covers every stage of the testing lifecycle, from planning to execution to reporting, and offers a comprehensive approach to test management.
Testing teams may have more flexibility if more test execution frameworks or integrations are supported. There might be a learning curve involved in figuring out some of the more sophisticated features. The user experience might be enhanced by more transparent cost breakdowns or clearer pricing structures.
The platform minimises disruptions during the adoption phase by offering tools and support to transfer existing test data smoothly.PractiTest's cloud-based architecture makes it accessible from anywhere in the world. Members of the team can work together and access testing data from any location. This feature-rich and adaptable test management platform can be used with a variety of team configurations and testing scenarios.
What i like best about PractiTest is how it's easy and straightforward to use.
It has a clean UI/UX that is so user friendly and makes it extremely easy to get started with it as soon as possible.
Uploading test cases from Excel to PractiTest is very easy, good and useful.
The customer support team is quick to respond.
One of the biggest challenges is how it asks for login after every 30 minutes which seems to be uncomfortable.
PractiTest is a great and convenient platform for test management, and software testing.
With it, It is very easy to maintain the test cases.
I like the fact that after each cycle, it is very possible to generate reports and see the test execution and successfulness of the cycle.
In practiTest, we can execute tests by creating customized suites and the execution status is very understandable.
PractiTest doesn't have inbuilt integration for few automation tools like Katalon Studio
Earlier we used to have google sheets to handle test cases and need to update the automation execution status manually. by using Practitest we can maintain the tests very cleanly.
The customer contact experience with the CS reps keeps myself and my team moving quickly and efficiently to manage our test efforts.
Stuggling with the API to integrate a 3rd party test result file.
Mapping test regression results to test coverage (requirements) and communicating weekly updates and progress to the Dev Team.
How the test sets can be created and easy to compile test cases
Should have provision to apply proper filteration for sub groups
Having all test cases at one place and easy to organize test suites and sets
1. Test Metrics
2. Test Execution
3. Screenshots Attaching
1. Taking time to load page whenever we we have modules and Test cases on page.
Easy to get test metrics
Tracking test execution
Referring attachments whenever we want to verify previous executions.
Test case import is really good, having a unique id for the test case throught out the test sets is a good feature when compared to other tools. User friendly and easy to use.
1. When we open any test set, it takes longer time to load, I understand we have many test cases in the test set
2. Test case assignment to the team: When we have multiple test cases in a test set, and if we want to assign only specific test cases, then we filter out using Sub-component and select all the test cases and bulk edit to assign it to a person. After the assignment is done, it takes long time to load the page
3. If we want to filter Status field with Pass, we can select it and filter it out as expected. But if we want to filter all the test cases with all status expect Pass, we have to manually select rest all options expect Pass to do so. If we have a feature to select only excluded field, it helps
4.Cannot filter test cases which is assigned to No one
Using PractiTest, we can see all the previous release execution releases and attachment at one go which is really helpful to backtrack
All the data is documented properly
Test case management and test cases creation and to keep a record of our testing for tracking or future purposes
When i tried to navigate back sometimes system is taking long time to reload.
Practitest is solving test management hurdles and helping to keep a record
Quick Response and APIs have made the automation easier
New UI is not very appealing to the eye. Also we cannot scroll Laterally in a test Set
APIs help me to integrate it with Automation
Looking for the right SaaS
We can help you choose the best SaaS for your specific requirements. Our in-house experts will assist you with their hand-picked recommendations.
Want more customers?
Our experts will research about your product and list it on SaaSworthy for FREE.
The collaboration between several members of the quality control team makes the management of test cases efficient, making it easier for multiple users to work on the same set without conflicts. Another thing that has impressed me a lot is the generation of reports after each Since this gives us instant insight into testing success, integration with Jira has proven to be a valuable resource, simplifying issue tracking and improving efficiency in software lifecycle management.
I've seen some limitations in the UI, especially in terms of column size while running test suites.
It has been an effective solution for us, The platform has significantly improved visibility and control in the testing process. The ability to generate and customize well-detailed reports has allowed me to have a better vision of what is happening and how things are progressing. By addressing difficulties we encountered in evaluating progress, identifying bottlenecks, and allocating resources effectively, we have improved operational efficiency.