OpenText TeamSite Reviews

A user friendly UI, customization as per requirements, scalability, content targeting, Metadata management, Multichannel and social content.

Sometimes feel difficulty with installation.

Best and easy tool for content authors & developers.

I am able to deliver all my client requirements with TeamSite.

It has all feature one WCM should have including Templating, Workflow and content management modules.

i would have like if they would have exposed TeamSite internal architecture to all clients.Cost of licensing is also high.

TeamSite is one of the top WCM tool and i am using this tool for various clients from last 7 years.All my clients are using only TeamSite and bringing more internal projects to TeamSite platform.

i am solving content creation,management and deployment requirement of all clients in my projects.

TeamSite is still the best off the rack WCM item. It has all elements that a Web Content Management ought to have including templates, workflow and substance administration modules. It is anything but difficult to utilize and just works. It is effective and fit for taking care of even the biggest of sites. It has been proved really helpful in acquiring customers.

TeamSite is based on a stage that is difficult to bolster - you'll need specific ability sets to design it and bolster it. Under the hood the item still runs extremely old complex configuration. One of the things which I felt was that OpenText TeamSite is costly to buy and own and is a bit overpriced. Apart from this, pretty much satisfying experience.

It permits us to deal with numerous destinations from one Web Content Management software and to guarantee a solid level of security. Most of my activities are undertaking scale WCM usage that by and large last up to a year. Simplifying and guaranteeing things are done rapidly in a compelling and brisk manner with TeamSite and alternate items in the TeamSite suite. We permit our business accomplices more control over their substance while keeping up consistency in the look/feel of our destinations.

TeamSIte's foundation guarantees that your site is behind an exceptionally secure layer of insurance. This permits us to execute best practices over the greater part of our web properties. There were a few repetition assignments I expected to finish each day, so I could change and adjust as much as I had to the local usefulness of Teamsite by doing overhauls in CMS amicable path.

It's not the most noticeably bad CMS I've ever utilized. Maybe absence of correspondence around overhaul requirements for our clients however I think I've not discovered information in right thing on the site. Lots of bugs and disturbances because of combination with TeamSite.

The organization that I work for offers composed and created sites, so we are frequently taking care of our customer's issues as opposed to our own. TeamSite is a genuine valuable instrument to manufacture a simple life for our clients. We had numerous engineers chipping away from various areas with particular nearby arranging ranges and to see it meet up and spill out of one page to another was pleasant.

TeamSite is in use at some extremely large environments. The scalability of TeamSite allows tens and even hundreds of projects on the same development server and push to disparate runtime environments independently.

The browser interface is a blessing and a curse. Because of the browser interface, there is no client install. However the product is dependent on the browser level and Java, which HP is not quick about validating. Many customers are using TS 7.3.2, which is a fairly recent version, but not the latest. However the official supported browsers are FireFox 14 and IE 9.

Cloud offering is quite helpful. Have some experience to help. I have seen some very poor implementations that were not successful because of some back architectural decisions.

We have about 25 active projects using TS and hundreds of content developers pushing content live daily. Each project has their own templates and workflows to implement their own policies and procedures.

It has many features that allow any enterprise business to securely update their website. There are a lot of functions that can be set up within this platform to accommodate large scale requests.

If not set up properly, this program can be very glitchy. I have been using the program for two years now and I have seen my fare share of issues.

TeamSite is a program that should only be used for enterprise businesses that have backend developers in place to update the constant demand for change.

I use this program to with one of the largest global consumer electronics brands in the country to distribute our e-commerce products, but we are looking to increase our use of design within the CMS platform. We are also looking for a program that will allow an easy transfer of data, which TeamSite lacks.

Highly customisable and scalable. Can do pretty much anything you'd want due to its tool kit nature if you know what you are doing. Versioning, workflow and deployments and very strong

Software installs as generally more difficult than they should be. Old version of TinyMCE used.

The software is highly customisable and there are generally several ways of doing any one particular thing. This makes for highly varied implementations, some good and some bad. One of the biggest mistakes companies make after buying TeamSite with or without LiveSite is hiring people without the correct experience resulting in the software getting a bad name and semi successful projects. It is also important to note that there is a significant jump between 6.x and 7.x of TeamSite and if your are implementing LiveSite check the people building the solution know how to implement TeamSite AND LiveSite. Smaller, niche consultancies are generally much better than your household names. If the consultants start talking about Perl run for the hills everything should be done in Java these days. Also if you are using LiveSite go with Java over .Net unless you really have to. There are very few .Net implementations out there and you'll struggle to find the people who know how to implement it properly. Also if you are doing a site redesign engage the LiveSite developers early on so the HTML designers can work with them.

Most of my projects are enterprise scale WCM implementations that generally last up to a year. These tend to include the management of multiple sites by 100s of authors doing 100s of changes and deployments a day.

Very stable, and usage of open deploy which hardly crashes.

Cumbersome, and takes a lot of custom coding to reach your overall goals.

Provide a state of the art content management system, that allows not technical users to develop content. It takes much of the day to day work off of IT, and provides responsive components out of the components.

It works with different types of operating systems such as Windows and UNIX (Linux and solaris). Flexible enough to incorporate and combine various core software technologies such as java, html, perl, ASP, XML, XSL ...etc. Easy to use interface with many features for the user to update web content (content, video, flash, images ...etc). Continuous evaluation and improvement of the product features and options by engineers.

It appears that the products popularity and use is on the decline when viewing vacant opportunities on job portals.

Creating/enhancing templates, components, workflows, processes ...etc. Users interface are better organized with more features.

Teamsite is very easy for publishing the content and provides flexibility to integrate with other systems.

Which makes it very popular.

Sometimes search does not work as fast as it should be

Some of the limitations like lackin of bulk update(if you have a system with multiple languages)

Please use it is very easy to handle .

In e-commerce plateform and fast moving world publishing the content and displaying it as fast as possible is very important now a days.

Teamsite provides facility and flexibility to achieve this.

You can use APIs to integrate with ither systems like for bulk update and faster content purge.