LendingQB Reviews

The overall experience is very good, aside from the issues using it sometimes. It gets the job done!

nothing. so far its a good software. aside from the normal issues (system down etc).

Mortgage banking. We use it for processing loans etc.

The overall experience is very good, aside from the issues using it sometimes. It gets the job done!

nothing. so far its a good software. aside from the normal issues (system down etc).

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

It has everything in one place. no need to be redirected to other pages... it has been a very good experience all the way from implementation until now. Very receptive to feedback and are willing to work with us on finding a solution to any problems we have. Constantly trying to make the product better.

Reporting, workflows, conditions/tasks, notifications, and audit could all be better. More granular control over the permissions and accesses to certain pages and functions in the system. Standard consumer portal is very dated

nothing at the moment.

It fits our work flow well and is very addaptible to our operations

It takes a few steps to select doc type and get them uploaded to edocs

worth a look

we now have a solid single platform for origination through funding and the sale of the loans

I like the stored docs best. I love how more than one person can be in the same file and make changes. I found the individual screens very productive. Drawing docs was easy.

I dislike the cost to change anything or customize certain screens.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

I like the stored docs best. I love how more than one person can be in the same file and make changes. I found the individual screens very productive. Drawing docs was easy.

I dislike the cost to change anything or customize certain screens.

The cost to customize anything is a bit steep.

Problems - tracking underwriting touches and communication just between processor and underwriter.

Benefits - drawing docs / printing docs / signing docs and sending them without having to print them.

The LendingQB interface is highly customizable, allowing organizations to build to their specific needs. I also appreciate that you can select favorites of the tabs you visit most frequently as this helps cut down time searching for the right section.

What I dislike so far is that everything seems to open in a different window. The main screen is one window, the loan screen is another, and the documents list is another. This does help with multitasking but can be confusing when clicking around windows.

We had been using a very old lending database that was not able to keep up with our demands. LendingQB is ever-developing to keep us up to date with the best lending tech. It also is easier to learn and navigate which saves time for current employees as well as when training new hires.

The LendingQB interface is highly customizable, allowing organizations to build to their specific needs. I also appreciate that you can select favorites of the tabs you visit most frequently as this helps cut down time searching for the right section.

What I dislike so far is that everything seems to open in a different window. The main screen is one window, the loan screen is another, and the documents list is another. This does help with multitasking but can be confusing when clicking around windows.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

nothing stands out that is better than any other system

fields cant be changed to a default - ie running do/du we should be able to default to re-issue credit - NOT pull new credit

on a FHA loan the default should be to finance the upfront MIP. from paid cash... i could go on

they arent solving anything