Home/ Headless CMS Software/ GraphCMS/ Reviews
86% SW Score The SW Score ranks the products within a particular category on a variety of parameters, to provide a definite ranking system. Read more
Create Headless CMS Using GraphQL
77.5%
20%
0%
2.5%
0%
Both the Content and Management APIs are incredibly versatile and powerful.
I was impressed that we could automate management tasks such as creating webhooks through an API.
Some features need a bit more love. Localisation is a bit janky, with weird treatment of the default language and not-so-intuitive mutations for updating data in localised fields. Overall it is manageable but could be better.
Having an automatically generated graphql API. Improved CMS experience for our content team. Automation via webhooks. A "source of truth" for our content metadata.
Very responsive to feedback when there's a bug or for feature requests.
They don't implement everything we've asked them to, but they listen and make improvements to their product when the feature makes sense.
Their webhook implementation is good, we use it to notify backend systems about content being updated, but we can opt out of receiving notifications when our automated systems performs the update.
The user interface is intuitive enough that normal people can use it.
The custom app integration is pretty nice. It allows us to do our own content quality checks and give instant feedback to the editor.
When you have a lot of data, the user interface can become slow.
You'll have to manually update a default view of each model to reduce the amount of data you fetch when you're just trying to get the overview.
If you have a lot of languages (10+) then the user interface can become a bit messy, but it's a lot nicer than many solutions out there.
Hygraph takes the burden of managing our content pieces, many of them very complex, without us having to update a single field.
It enables us to move quickly in content creation, and update our content modeling without having to write many lines of code.
We also don't have to worry about handling the database for the content (our data is easily in the hundreds of gigabytes, if not a few terabytes)
It's free to get started, and priced competitively to the market. Data schemas are easy to develop, and GraphQL is easy to work with. The static asset service is great - super easy to resize, crop, and change image formats for optimum cross-platform delivery.
Web interfaces are somewhat limited, although I know they are working to make improvements here.
It is our content management platform and allows us to have a single source of truth for all of our content and static asset needs.
GraphQL API. After migrating our blog from hubspot which uses rest api I realised how lucky I was to use Hygraph. I'm a content creator so I knew Hygraph before as Graphcms and created some blog generation content with it. So I was the one suggested it to my team :) Thank you for creating it! Its super fast easy learning curve and people value your ideas. Thank you
Changing the schema validations after you create 1000+ content on the schema is harsh. I added slug later on after adding 1000+ entries and wasnt able to autofill the slugs from blog titles
we are using it as cms for our lovely blog
I actually needed to choose a CMS for the project we started working few months ago. Here are some reasons why we decided to go with Hygraph
- versatile
- easy to use
- support team is fast and helpful
- has good/ cheap bandwidth/ API calls/ user seats options
- graphql !
No CMS is perfect, these are few things I think needs improvement but I can live without:
- no easy integration with media management platforms like Cloudinary
- Hygraph supports assets upload, which is nice, but you can't query only the fields you need from the assets, you need to get its entire data
We needed a content management solution for our multilanguage website. Hygraph provided
It is super easy to use, good documentations and I love the usage of graphQL. Having multiple branches also helped us a lot in our development. Its schema also provides everything we need.
I don't think there is anything we dislike about it. Maybe having an extra branch would have helped so we could have production, staging and dev. Other than that I think it is all right.
Considering that we have our own designs so we had to choose a Headless CMS so we tried different ones and we picked HyGraph. In addition, it had a good support team.
The platform is really user friendly. Every component that helps you edit your content is well chosen and designed. You just don't need to be a high-end developer to get grip on the fundamentals of Hygraph. In our university we use Hygraph to teach our students how to model data. Well... Hypgraph made it so easy that our students really get prepared before they jump into an abstract programming layer. With Hygraph we wrote a tool to keep track of the learning progress of our students. We started 2 years ago, and really... Hygraph has 0 days of downtime. So realibale, we are greatful we can work with a tool that is fun to work and teach with.
Because Hygraph is well developed and designed, you can clearly see the extra oppurtunities you can get out of the tool. Development takes time... The roadmap of Hygraph is well built and chosen and fits the needs of their users. Maybe we are not to patient enough :-).
We needed a platform that was user friendly enough to work with, even for people who are not used to a CMS or tech in general. With the easy accesible dashboard, our users can immediatly edit and upload new content.
The ease of intergration and the flexibility it offers, including the locals, this makes it work with many different complex sites. Also, their support is always there to help whenever you need.
The lack of being able to add HTML to the free text editor for complex nested lists in T&C documents etc this was in previous versions
It solves multiple issues by having the flexibility of being a headless CMS system and having the documentation and support, making the product stable and robust.
Hygraph allows users to customize content templates, styles, and formats to suit their specific needs and brand guidelines, providing flexibility and creative control over the generated content.
free API limit is 1 M .which can be utilized in less time. Users may have concerns about the cost or pricing structure of Hygraph, as it may require a financial investment that may not be feasible for all budgets or business sizes.
it offers collaboration features that allow teams to work together on content creation projects, facilitating communication, coordination, and feedback among team members. This can help improve team productivity and streamline content creation workflows for businesses with multiple content creators or stakeholders.
Looking for the right SaaS
We can help you choose the best SaaS for your specific requirements. Our in-house experts will assist you with their hand-picked recommendations.
Want more customers?
Our experts will research about your product and list it on SaaSworthy for FREE.
This is my goto CMS for any project I create.
It's very intuitive, the free plan limitations are just enough for small projects.
Helpful API playground makes any integration simple and fast.
Customer support is very helpful and responsive, even outside the working hours. They were kind enough to grant me an access to the premium feature for a university project!
The localization of assets might be easier
As any content management system, Hygraph helps me separate the struggle of filling the client's content for their webpage by simply allowing them access to the project and do it themselves.
Besides that, it has an excelent set of free features, perfect for creating all startup projects.