Claude Reviews

It aims to be helpful wherever possible, without overstepping its capabilities as an AI.

Anthropic designed Claude to understand and respond to human language in a conversational, contextual way.

It has a cleaner interface than ChatGPT.

Claude is still evolving as all AI tools. It sometimes refuses to answer questions especially when it deals with controversy. It appears to be trained to have higher moral standards.

It is more intuitive in its response. The conversations I had with Claude delivered results in my research and writing that are fully conversational in tone and digestible.

The tone is different than other AI chat software I've used. It's more conversational in tone and less sterile sounding. It still sounds authoritative, but without sounding like a cliff notes version of AI. I find myself using it more than other AI software for the same content and marketing creation.

Nothing yet. I've used 99% of the output it's produced.

As a solopreneur, it's like adding more people to my team to complete job functions I don't really have the time for.

The discourse and summarization seems more natural compared to similar services and it offers good outputs on generic tasks such as translations

Nothing really, I should point out that I use the free version which has limitation compared to paid plans

Easy to use to analyze text, request a translation, I find it particularly useful on summarizing articles and text

It sometimes gives me better text than ChatGPT. And otherwise it's equal or slightly inferior. Either way, I can get two distinct articles based on the same prompt and post them in different places. it also gives me the copy in plain text so I can copy & paste it easily into a doc.

Sometimes the copy is just too bland or incomplete. It's easy to hit the free limits and it's not clear what those limits are.

When I write an article based on a certain keyword, I can get two distinct articles based on the same prompt and post them in different places. It sometimes gives me better text than ChatGPT. And otherwise it's equal or only slightly inferior. Sometimes if ChatGPT is acting up I can get a better answer from Claude.

Attaching files is very important because it reduces copy-paste effort and you can easily segment the logic questions and the context. This is especially true for development tasks.

Now that it's available in my country, I am happy. However, when dealing with larger files (ie, 10K in size) they seem to be ignored. I would rather like some kind of indication that the file was not processed.

Code review, idea generation and general text review. It's very helpful when writing code.

Claude gets copy where it needs to be quicker and with less prompts than ChatGPT.

I haven't found anything I dislike about Claude so far.

Claude helps with copywriting and enhancing writing to sound better than we initially had it, quicker than ChatGPT

When you try to ask the same thing in ChatGPT, Bard and Claude, in most cases Claude explains the topic in a better way than the other two. Also, most of the time, it provides information in easy to understand language.

In few cases it takes a different approach and way of explanation which is not exactly correct and in some cases even out right wrong. In some cases when there is too much information presented by the assistant, I found it to be difficult to ready due to the narrow messenger template of the site. There have been multiple instances where the site was unavailable for hours.

I use Claude mainly for my assignments and projects, where it helps me understand the concepts and implement it. Many times when ChatGPT or Bard gives indecisive results, I use Claude where it is really good in explaining the concept to help you understand the process which in turn will help come up with the solution.

Intutive answers that continue and add to my thoughts as typed into "Message Claude..." Perfect grammer and sounds like an expert on the subject.

It does go pretty deep into it's answers but it is better to have much info rather than not enough. It is easy enough to read through and select and delete what fits my results best.

Whan I get results on subject I am not familar with I may not catch a mistake in Claude's answer. But there have been very few mistakes that I have noticed, I love the ease of use over my minor problems. Don't ever trust anybody or anything 100 percent of the time.

Claude gives honest and more human like responses/answers. So it feels better to use than other such AI tools.

Currently Claude is not available outside of US and UK. But at least I can use it from integration in Slack.

It benefits me personally to write official emails or messages. It answers quickly to my questions, so instead of using Search feature on internet, this does the job quickly.