Home/ BIM Software/ ALLPLAN/ Reviews
Align the design and construction process throughout all project phases
65.4%
26.9%
7.7%
0%
0%
I like the structure of the program, and the freedom to open different drawings (editable and non-editable) at the same time. The drawings can be used as reference or as primary file. The platform is able to co-working at the same time thanks to the structure. And the structure of ALLPLAN is clear, easy to use and very easy to learn.
Not being able to work from separate computers (from physically different places) on the same project at the same time smoothly. With large files and with lot of data ALLPLAN can be slower at the editing. There are failures what don`t have any reason and can cause dataloss.
If they need it for 3D modelling or for 2D drwaings then ALLPLAN is the right tool for them. In a smaller or also in a bigger office is the perfect software for small buildings and even for very big projects. You can manage it very easily all within ALLPLAN.
Producing plans in a timely manner; the time required to finish a plan is reduced, thanks to Allplan. In 3D modelling are a lot of possibilities. All of the building information can be saved in the 3D elements. The planproducing is very quick, the functions are very good and easy to use.
very easy to use, consuming time, its the best
nothing to mention, best program till this moment.
I highly recommend this program to all Designers.
Reinforcement Detailing, Steel Design, Architectural plans
Flexibility
Woking method
Interface
Methodology
Some elements are still old..
Solar system errors
BIM coordination failures
Overlappings
Detailed elements
And creative production environment
Accuracy in Cost estimate
BIM capabilities, easy and efficient measurement and export of quantities, efficient actual drafting tools and workflow, capabilities to organize and tackle big projects, capabilities of collaboration between all involved in the construction process
for actual architectural conceptual or first design not an ideal tool in comparison with, for instance, sketchup, although great for error-proofing of designs in a second step. Creation of macros, although a very powerful tool, suffers from an awkward interface. Data connection with/to some very popular local/national cost/offer management systems is lacking or poor/awkward.
If you are looking for an all round modular package to get all work done, which any building challenge may throw at you, Allplan is a very good candidate. Especially its BIM capabilities are very good and future proof. Caution with too high of expectations regarding a sketchup-like first draft/design approach though, Allplan is not the right tool for that particular job. Be aware also of the fact, that your local/national system of construction progress may not be a 100% mirrored by the structure that Allplan provides you. You may have to get creative in some corners.
General construction work planning and work in reformation or repair of existing buildings. The main benefit I and our studio get out of the use of Allplan is the huge time savings compared to other products and the flexibility and speed with which we can respond to changes on site or in user and customer requirements.
1) Its flexibility: from very quick architectural design to construction modelling, from buildings to detailed joinery, from new buildings to historical ones.
2) The way information is organised: the "building structure" is one of the smartest feature to manage BIM
3) Interface with spreadsheet: we've developed a system to estimate the cost of the building, progress of work, etc, linking the model with third party pricing book (e.g. RICS).
4) Its scalability: allows to be very efficient as one-man-band or working as a team
I start using Allplan after graduating and I never stopped.
Modules like "stair" which have been pretty much unchanged in the last 20 years...
Unfortunately is not well-know as other software. However, having previous experience as teacher at the University, I always managed training in-house.
Few things I would like to see in the next releases:
1) Developing further modules for timber and steel construction (boosting the use of macro and smart parts)
2) Introducing a basic module to calculate U value and Glaser Diagram (that is a very straightforward improvement) would be beneficial.
3) Introducing a module to do the daylight calculation (something like Velux Daylight Visualiser..)
4) introducing a basic module for MEP as standard feature for architecture
I never worked with traditional CAD in my professional career.
Just the idea of working in a 2D or 3D non-parametric environment is simply madness in my view.
Since the very beginning (20 years ago) I've experienced at least 50% of time savings for standard architectural drawings.
In the last 6 years I started developing construction models (initially in architectural firm, later in a construction company).
With Construction Modelling I solve 95% of problems occurring on site in 5% of the time.
More recently, with a friend and colleague, I've developed a system to synchronise the model with third party pricing books: we obtain estimate of cost in a matter of minutes.
The accuracy of our cost estimate is exceptionally good.
Using a specific platform (BIM plus) we are now experimenting the use of the model directly on site to check on details, materials, etc.
After 20 years I can certainly say that I'm working BIM completely with all the 5 dimension (3+ Cost + Time) which is a great achievement.
The biggest benefit is that, once built on screen, any project will be built on site without any surprise, missing information, uncoordinated information.
I'm not a fan of the so-called "federated model" as roles and responsibility are still rigidly dictated by the traditional way of working.
Nonetheless, I've exchanged information and pieces of model with colleagues structural engineers without problems improving coordination and clash detection.
Easy to operate, smooth graphic and process in almost PC/Laptop. Also complete function and tools.
Some old handy features has been removed
It's a powerful CAD/BIM software that we should have. Especially for reinforcement detailing.
Easy to make a 2D detailing and the best part is how Allplan generate 3D reinforcement for any shape of structure. Then get a free clash model with coalitions check tools. Also BIM+ is excellent for BIM process
I enjoyed working with 2D details made of 3D model which were connected.
Little difficult environment at the very beginning. Working with multiple sheets does not work properly sometimes which leads to complication while multiple people using same sheet.
Depends on the area where your business operate. Allplan is often required by customers. In thah case its quite clear and you should go for it. It works good and I have to say, that support is always trying hard to solve all the problems.
3D reinforcing. Reinforcing of the curvy elements - bridges, road elements.
It's the best program for modeling and reinforced concrete. I like to use ALLPLAN because it's multifunctional and has a lot of work possibilities, that help me create and be eficient in what I do.
:) Price. It's not always for my pocket.
And, it's doesn't work for Linux.
If you can afford it, it is a very good program, which I highly recommend.
I think it's the best program for construction field, and you can do everything with ALLPLAN.
Easy modelling and absolutely very great tool to take right quantities off in every desired forms.
“Distrubion of ALLPLAN in Turkey 🇹🇷 “ absolutely must be supported more and more by Nemetscheck... People must know much about ALLPLAN.
It is future of Construction and techical office of civil engineering.
RIGHT QUANTITIES... Very succesfull 3D Modelling...
Looking for the right SaaS
We can help you choose the best SaaS for your specific requirements. Our in-house experts will assist you with their hand-picked recommendations.
Want more customers?
Our experts will research about your product and list it on SaaSworthy for FREE.
ALLPLAN has developed a integrated BIM solution especially for the requirements of bridge construction.
It's a hard, slow and expensive process.
Structural analysis and code-dependent design, as well as through fast construction variant comparisons