Compare : Prometheus vs Aerospike

• Excellent
  64%
• Very Good
  29.3%
• Average
  6.7%
• Poor
  0%
• Terrible
  0%

• Excellent
  66.7%
• Very Good
  31%
• Average
  2.4%
• Poor
  0%
• Terrible
  0%

Easy to Install and Configure, Extensive Integrations, Customizable Metrics, Efficient Monitoring

Complex Query Language (PromQL), Limited Built-in Visualization, Steep Learning Curve, Lack of Detailed Documentation

High Performance, Low Latency, Ease of Use, Scalability

Lack of Comprehensive UI, Limited Querying Capabilities, Complex Data Handling for Large Records, Limited Community Support

Users praise Prometheus for its robust monitoring capabilities, highlighting its user-friendly interface, extensive metrics library, and flexible alerting system. They appreciate its ability to collect and visualize data from diverse sources, enabling comprehensive monitoring of IT infrastructure and applications. Additionally, users commend Prometheus's open-source nature, strong community support, and active development, ensuring continuous improvements and feature enhancements. While some users mention occasional performance issues or a learning curve for new users, the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, reflecting Prometheus's effectiveness as a monitoring solution.

Aerospike is consistently praised for its blazing speed and high performance, particularly for key-value storage and low latency operations. Users appreciate its scalability and ease of setup, often citing it as a reliable replacement for Redis and other NoSQL databases. While the product is generally well-received, some users mention concerns regarding documentation, a lack of certain enterprise features, and limitations with secondary indexes. Overall, Aerospike is considered a strong choice for applications demanding high throughput and real-time data access, but users should carefully evaluate its suitability based on specific needs and potential trade-offs.