Compare : Loopio vs RocketDocs

• Excellent
  83.3%
• Very Good
  15.2%
• Average
  1.4%
• Poor
  0%
• Terrible
  0%

• Excellent
  44.2%
• Very Good
  44.2%
• Average
  7.3%
• Poor
  2.4%
• Terrible
  1.8%

User-friendly Interface, Robust Content Library, Efficient Collaboration Features, Effective RFP Automation

Inconsistent Magic Feature Accuracy, Occasional Formatting Issues, Limited Third-Party Integrations, Challenging Source Document Imports

Content Library Management, User Friendly Interface, Easy Search Functionality, Efficient RFP Management

Salesforce Integration Issues, Content Formatting Issues, Cumbersome Record Updating, Limited Search Functionality

Loopio receives praise for its user-friendly interface, efficient document management capabilities, and solid security features. Users value its centralized platform for storing, organizing, and sharing documents, streamlining the collaboration process. The software's ability to track changes, provide version control, and offer customizable workflows is also well-received. Additionally, Loopio's customer support is often commended for its responsiveness and willingness to assist users. However, some users have expressed concerns regarding the software's occasional glitches and the need for improved integration options with other tools.

Rocket Docs users frequently praise its content library for its ease of use and organization, particularly for managing and retrieving information for RFPs and questionnaires. They appreciate the ability to create templates for quick proposal generation and centralized storage of company knowledge. However, some users express frustration with the search function, finding it unreliable and requiring precise wording for accurate results. Additionally, several users mention issues with integration, particularly with Salesforce, and formatting inconsistencies. Despite these drawbacks, most users view Rocket Docs as a valuable tool for streamlining their RFP processes and improving team efficiency.