Compare : Carta vs Global Shares

• Excellent
  57.2%
• Very Good
  33.1%
• Average
  1.7%
• Poor
  1.3%
• Terrible
  6.7%

• Excellent
  91%
• Very Good
  9%
• Average
  0%
• Poor
  0%
• Terrible
  0%

User-friendly Interface, Comprehensive Cap Table Management, Efficient Equity Management, Helpful Customer Support

High Pricing, Confusing User Interface, Lack of Robust Reporting Functionality, Tedious Onboarding Process

Easy to Use Interface, Excellent Customer Support, Seamless Onboarding Process, Comprehensive Cap Table Management

Limited Advanced Features, Occasional Bugs in New Features, Time Zone Differences, Lack of Waterfall Modeling

Carta is generally well-received by users, earning praise for its user-friendly interface, comprehensive features for managing equity, and strong customer support. Many users highlight the platform's ease of use, even for those with limited financial knowledge, and appreciate the ability to track and manage cap tables, investments, and shareholder communications efficiently. Carta is also lauded for its robust security measures and regular updates that introduce new features and improvements. However, some users have encountered occasional technical glitches and expressed concerns about the platform's pricing, which they deem suitable for larger organizations but less accessible to startups and small businesses.

Global Shares is praised by users for its ease of use and effectiveness in managing cap tables, streamlining equity management, and replacing cumbersome spreadsheets. Users consistently highlight the exceptional onboarding experience, with the dedicated team proving responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful. While the platform is considered a valuable solution for startups, some users note that it may lack certain advanced features compared to competitors. Additionally, a few users mention minor technical issues, though these are typically addressed promptly.