Compare : Built for Teams vs Proliant

• Excellent
  75.7%
• Very Good
  21.7%
• Average
  2.1%
• Poor
  0.4%
• Terrible
  0%

• Excellent
  66.4%
• Very Good
  24.9%
• Average
  5%
• Poor
  1.3%
• Terrible
  2.4%

• Excellent
  55.4%
• Very Good
  8.9%
• Average
  0%
• Poor
  5.4%
• Terrible
  30.4%

User-Friendly Interface, Easy PTO Tracking, Efficient PTO Approval Process, Comprehensive Company Directory

Limited Integrations with Other Software, Lack of Detailed Reporting Features, Occasional Performance Issues, Limited Customization Options

Excellent Customer Service, User-Friendly Interface, Comprehensive Reporting Functionality, Efficient Onboarding Process

Time and Labor Module Issues, Inconsistent System Integrations, Lack of System Customization, Occasional System Errors

Knowledgeable HR Support, Comprehensive HR Resources and Templates, Improved HR Compliance, Dedicated HR Manager

Unresponsive Customer Service, Technical Issues and Glitches, Inaccurate Information and Advice, Misleading Sales Practices

Built for Teams is a user-friendly platform that primarily excels in PTO tracking and management. Users appreciate its simplicity, ease of use, and clear visual representation of PTO balances and schedules. The platform facilitates efficient time off requests, approvals, and communication, making it a valuable tool for organizations of all sizes, particularly for smaller businesses. While integration with other HR software and more customization options are desired by some, the overall consensus is positive, highlighting Built for Teams as a user-friendly and efficient solution for PTO management.

Proliant users generally appreciate its user-friendly interface, wide range of features, and helpful customer support. They find it intuitive and easy to use, with a customizable dashboard and well-organized menus. Many users highlight the effectiveness of Proliant's features in improving their productivity, streamlining workflows, and enhancing collaboration within teams. However, some users have experienced occasional technical glitches and have suggested areas for improvement, such as enhancing the reporting capabilities and providing more comprehensive training materials. Overall, Proliant users find it a valuable tool that enables them to work more efficiently and effectively.

User reviews of Bambee are mixed, with praise for its dedicated HR teams and helpful guidance, but also concerns about inconsistent service, communication issues, and pricing. Many users appreciate the personalized support, accessibility of HR professionals, and readily available templates. However, several reviewers experienced delays in responses, unclear communication, difficulties scheduling calls, and frustration with pricing changes, highlighting a need for improved customer support and transparency.